We object to unbalanced witness list of House Ed Committee hearings

The Education and Workforce Committee of the US House of Representatives is holding hearings on “innovation” in education policy today. The  list of witnesses completely excludes the people who have the greatest stake in public school improvement – parents. The witnesses also represent a single, ideologically driven approach to educational policy that has yet to produce significant benefits for American schoolchildren.

All four witnesses are pro-privatization: Dr. Tony Bennett, Indiana Superintendent of Public Instruction,  a strong supporter of charter schools and “virtual charter school” expansion; Lisa Graham Keegan of Education Breakthrough Network, a supporter of vouchers, high stakes testing and charter schools; Andrew Coulson of  the CATO Institute, yet another supporter of charter expansion and vouchers; and Ted Mitchell, CEO of the New Schools Venture Fund, which funds charter school expansion.

The founding members of Parents Across America spoke out against this unbalanced hearing:

“It is not in the best interests of children if House Committee members only hear testimony from people who support the current corporate agenda of further privatization, charter expansion, and high-stakes testing. The majority of public school parents oppose these strategies, and we know that none of them have worked to improve schools in Chicago or  anywhere else in the nation,” said Julie Woestehoff of Chicago’s PURE and a co-founder of PAA. “We call on the committee to act responsibly  and also hear other viewpoints including those of parents, who have the most at stake in these decisions.”

“Experimentation on children with unproven fads is not ‘innovation,’ ” said PAA founding member Caroline Grannan of San Francisco. “We need reforms that have been proven to work, like smaller classes, encouraging parent involvement, and meaningful assessment instead of battering our children with endless bubble-in tests. Parents want reforms that improve schools rather than weakening them.”

Leonie Haimson of New York City’s Class Size Matters and Parents Across America concluded: “These points of view do not represent “innovation” but privatization. The federal government seems intent on large scale experimentation on our children without parent consent. We demand that public school parents, as the most important stakeholders, be given a chance to testify at  every Congressional education hearing from now on. These are our children, and our voices must be heard.”

Posted on by admin Posted in News & Updates, Press Releases

2 Responses to We object to unbalanced witness list of House Ed Committee hearings

  1. Heather Crossin

    I am a parent from Indiana, where major reforms are on the verge of being passed into law. A few friends and I are trying to fight these reforms, even though it is in the eleventh hour. Regardless of the outcome over the next few weeks, we would like to get better organized to fight these changes. Do you have any advice for us? Can you let us know, if there are others from Indiana who have joined your group so we can network?

    Best wishes, and thank you for all of your efforts!

  2. Pingback: Social Reform in Education: the Skinny on Race to the Top | Education Ordo Amoris