Our proposals on the Senate ESEA reauthorization bill

This letter is available as a pdf here.  A version of the letter which you can edit to fax to your Senators is here.

A handy chart laying out which provisions in the bill we support and oppose is here.

October 18, 2011

Re: Reauthorization of ESEA

Dear Senator Harkin:

Your proposed revisions to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act show that you and the HELP Committee have listened to some of the concerns voiced by parents and others about the problems with No Child Left Behind. For example, we strongly support doing away with the adequate yearly progress measurement, and agree that requiring states to adopt unreliable test-based principal and teacher evaluation will only lead to an overemphasis on standardized tests and the further narrowing of the curriculum. Thank you from Parents Across America!

However, we believe that too many of the ineffective, damaging elements of NCLB remain in the Senate proposal, and that it does not address more important, fundamental problems facing our nation’s schools and students. Specifically, instead of the rigid menu imposed on schools needing improvement, including punitive school closings, privatization, or other set policies imposed from above with no track record of success, solutions should be devised through stakeholder input from the ground up, including parents.

In addition, options should include research-based improvements including class size reduction, expansion of preschool programs, and more parent involvement in decision-making at all levels. Right now, schools with the most at-risk students are being closed or forced to arbitrarily fire half their staff. Not only does this seriously disrupt children’s lives, but it also undermines communities and fatally weakens the effort to recruit and keep high-quality teachers in our neediest schools. Given the harsh school budget cuts being carried out across the U. S., this is simply not the time to throw more precious education funds away on more experimental or damaging policies.

We also feel strongly that parents should have the right to have their children opt out of high-stakes testing—and that any accountability system should include multiple measures of success, including parent and teacher surveys. We oppose the continuation of the risky and damaging Race to the Top and Innovation grant programs. Attached please find a summary of specific recommendations from PAA for a better ESEA.

As the primary stakeholders of the public schools, parents have a deep-rooted understanding of the challenges facing our educational system. We would welcome the opportunity to testify at any hearings called on the topic of ESEA reauthorization.

Thank you so much for your time and attention, and for your service to our children.

Sincerely,

Julie Woestehoff, Legislative Chair, Parents Across America

____

Parents Across America Recommendations for a better ESEA

October 2011

ESEA should NOT:

• Promote policies that use standardized test scores or graduation data as the primary accountability measures for schools, teachers or students. Overemphasis on such data encourages cheating and manipulation, and has led to narrowing of the school curriculum and replacing important school subjects with math and reading test prep.

• Limit federally-mandated school improvement models to a narrow set of strategies, including school closings privatization, and/or firing half the staff, which are punitive and have had little verified success. Right now, schools with the highest needs students are being targeted for closure or other damaging prescriptions that disrupt children’s lives and undermine any effort to recruit and keep high-quality teachers in our neediest schools.

• Mandate charter takeovers or other forms of outsourcing school management that take resources from the schools attended by most students and put them into private hands, with less oversight.

• Identify those schools needing improvement by means of rigid formulas that do not take into account the need level of the student population.

• Continue the risky and damaging Race to the Top and Investing in Innovation grant programs.

A better ESEA should include:

• Requirements that ensure fairly distributed, adequate resources in all public schools, so that every child receives a high-quality education.

• Support for improving schools rather than closing them, by means of evidence-based solutions, including class size reduction and expansion of preK programs, as designed by parents and other stakeholders at the school level.

• Less emphasis on standardized testing and more reliable accountability and assessment practices including local, teacher-designed assessments supplemented with teacher and parent surveys and site visits.

• Programs that encourage the retention of professional, experienced teachers, especially at the most challenged schools.

• A full range of parent involvement opportunities including a stronger parent voice in decision making at the school, district, state, and national levels.

• The right of parents to opt their children out of standardized tests.

The full version of the Parents Across America Position Paper on the Reauthorization
of the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) can be found at
http://paa.nodegarden.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ESEApositionFINAL4-20-11.pdf

For more information please email us at info@parentsacrossamerica.org or visit us online at www.parentsacrossamerica.org

Posted on by leoniehaimson Posted in News & Updates, Parent Resources, Uncategorized

5 Responses to Our proposals on the Senate ESEA reauthorization bill

  1. Pingback: Parents United for Responsible Education » Blog Archive » Another few hours for ESEA input?

  2. dfsvhtok

    2MShvU ktptiktmlsyk

  3. Cap Lee

    The recommendations in the above letter are admirable and need to be implemented immediately. Having said that, there are additional concerns that must be brought to the forefront to assure a proper education for all children.

    We must realize that the fundamental system of education was never designed to serve all. It was designed in the late 18th century, during slavery, by Thomas Jefferson who called its purpose “Raking a few geniuses from the rubbish.” This fundamental system of education must be changed to respect the intelligence and abilities of all or public education will (and should) perish.

    We must fully recognize that kids learn in different ways, demonstrate learning in different ways and, most important, blossom at different times. Kids get their teeth at different times, start walking at different times, start talking at different times, how can we, in our wildest imagination, demand that all kids learn at the same time, at the same age, in the same seat, taking the same test, on the same page of the same book. In addition, many kids are devastated by the effects of poverty and other obstacles in the way of learning that alter their rate of learning. Why are we insistant on all kids being educationally pure.

    We must develop a delivery system of education that takes kids from where they are. Those who move throught the system faster should be allowed to do so. And we must be a people who waits for those who move slower. They might well be smarter than the “book learned” kids who are good at the test.

    The bottom line is unless we change the fundamental system of education, all the recommendations above will be a waste of time and effort.

    Cap Lee
    http://www.WholeChildReform.com
    Caplee@wi.rr.com

  4. Pingback: Parent Across America submits proposals for ESEA reauthorization | Grumpy Opinions

  5. uiihfmd

    ZGGHb2 znlydwdcmcas

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.